The Story: Black Friday Meltdown
How one imaginary team transformed their fragile Black Friday nightmare into a bulletproof workflow engine
The 3 AM Wake-Up Call
It's Black Friday, 2023. Sarah, the lead engineer at GrowthCorp, gets the call every e-commerce engineer dreads:
"Checkout is failing 15% of the time. Credit cards are being charged but orders aren't being created. Customer support has 200 tickets and counting. We're losing $50K per hour."
Sound familiar? I really hope not, for your sake. But it probably does, because if it didn't, you might not be reading this.
Sarah's team had built what looked like a solid checkout flow. It worked perfectly in staging. The code was clean, the tests passed, and the load tests showed it could handle 10x their normal traffic.
But production is different. Payment processors have hiccups. Inventory services timeout. Email delivery fails. And when any piece fails, the entire checkout becomes a house of cards.
The Fragile Foundation
Here's what their original checkout looked like - a typical monolithic service that tries to do everything in one transaction:
class CheckoutService
def process_order(cart_items, payment_info, customer_info)
# Step 1: Validate the cart
validated_items = validate_cart_items(cart_items)
raise "Invalid cart" if validated_items.empty?
# Step 2: Calculate totals
totals = calculate_order_totals(validated_items)
# Step 3: Process payment
payment_result = PaymentProcessor.charge(
amount: totals[:total],
payment_method: payment_info
)
raise "Payment failed" unless payment_result.success?
# Step 4: Update inventory
update_inventory_levels(validated_items)
# Step 5: Create the order
order = Order.create!(
items: validated_items,
total: totals[:total],
payment_id: payment_result.id,
customer: customer_info
)
# Step 6: Send confirmation
OrderMailer.confirmation_email(order).deliver_now
order
rescue => e
# What do we do here? Payment might be charged...
logger.error "Checkout failed: #{e.message}"
raise
end
endWhat could go wrong? Everything.
Payment succeeds, inventory update fails: Customer charged, no order created
Order created, email fails: Customer doesn't know about their order
Inventory updated, order creation fails: Products locked, no record of purchase
Any failure requires manual investigation: No visibility into which step failed
During their Black Friday meltdown, Sarah's team spent 6 hours manually reconciling payments, inventory, and orders. Every engineer on the team was debugging production instead of sleeping.
The Reliable Alternative
After their Black Friday nightmare, Sarah's (again, completely imaginary) team discovered Tasker. Here's how they rebuilt their checkout as a reliable, observable workflow.
Complete Working Examples
All the code examples in this post are tested and validated in the Tasker engine repository. You can see the complete, working implementation here:
📁 E-commerce Reliability Examples
This includes:
YAML Configuration - Workflow structure and retry policies
Task Handler - Runtime behavior and enterprise features
Step Handlers - Individual workflow steps
Models - Order and Product models
Demo Scripts - Interactive examples you can run
Key Configuration Highlights
The YAML configuration separates workflow structure from business logic:
Business Logic in Step Handlers
Each step is implemented as a focused, testable class. For example, the ValidateCartHandler handles cart validation and pricing:
Now each step is isolated, retryable, and has clear dependencies. You can see the complete implementation of all step handlers in the GitHub repository:
ValidateCartHandler - Cart validation and pricing calculation
ProcessPaymentHandler - Payment processing with intelligent retry logic
UpdateInventoryHandler - Inventory management
CreateOrderHandler - Order record creation
SendConfirmationHandler - Email delivery with retry logic
Each handler includes:
Error handling for both retryable and permanent failures
Structured logging with correlation IDs for tracing
Input validation and result formatting
Integration with external services (payment processors, inventory systems)
The Magic: What Changed
1. Atomic Steps with Clear Dependencies
Each step is now atomic and isolated. If inventory update fails, the payment has already succeeded and been recorded. Tasker knows exactly where to restart.
2. Intelligent Retry Logic
Different retry strategies for different failure types:
Payment processing: 3 retries with 30-second timeout
Email delivery: 5 retries (email services are often flaky)
Inventory updates: 2 retries with shorter timeout
See the complete retry configuration in the YAML file.
3. Built-in State Management
Tasker tracks the state of every step. If something fails, you can see exactly where:
4. REST API for Monitoring
Complete visibility through Tasker's REST API:
5. Event-Driven Monitoring
The event subscriber examples show how to implement real-time monitoring and alerting.
How to Execute the Workflow
Using this new reliable workflow is simple:
The Results (Again, Imaginary, But Directly Inspired by Real-World Experience)
Before Tasker:
15% checkout failure rate during peak traffic
6-hour manual reconciliation after failures
No visibility into failure points
Customer support overwhelmed with "where's my order?" tickets
After Tasker:
0.2% checkout failure rate (only non-retryable payment failures)
Automatic recovery for 98% of transient failures
Complete visibility into every step
Failed steps retry automatically with exponential backoff
Sarah's team went from being woken up every Black Friday to sleeping soundly while their workflows handled millions of orders reliably.
Key Takeaways
Break monolithic processes into atomic steps - Each step should do one thing well and be independently retryable
Define clear dependencies - Tasker ensures steps execute in the right order and only when their dependencies succeed
Embrace failure as normal - Design for failure with appropriate retry strategies for different types of errors
Make everything observable - You can't fix what you can't see. Tasker gives you complete visibility into workflow execution
Think in workflows, not procedures - Workflows can pause, retry, and resume. Procedures just fail.
Try It Yourself
The complete working examples include:
🏃♂️ Quick Setup Scripts
Simulates real checkout scenarios
Demonstrates failure handling and recovery
Shows monitoring and observability features
Complete RSpec tests for all components
Performance benchmarks
Failure scenario testing
📊 Monitoring Your Checkout Performance
With Tasker's analytics capabilities, you can monitor checkout performance in real-time:
What's Next?
In our next post, we'll explore how to handle even more complex scenarios with parallel execution and event-driven monitoring when we tackle "The Data Pipeline That Kept Everyone Awake."
All examples in this series are tested, validated, and ready to run in the Tasker engine repository.
Have you dealt with similar reliability challenges in your workflows? Share your war stories in the comments below.
Last updated